Perficient
JULY 11, 2022
Buy now, pay later (BNPL) is a type of point-of-sale installment loan that partners with retailers to allow consumers to pay for their purchases in multiple equal payments. which is a huge draw to using BNPL as a non-cash payment method. What Are Some Buy Now, Pay Later Companies? Which one is best for me?
PYMNTS
OCTOBER 3, 2019
The move means that users of Stripe’s payments platform can now connect to TaxCloud to manage their U.S. Since the Supreme Court issued its opinion in South Dakota v. TaxCloud has announced the launch of a new integration with Stripe. Wayfair last year, many online retailers now have to collect sales tax in additional states.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
PYMNTS
OCTOBER 24, 2019
Zuckerberg Tells Congress That Libra Fills A Global Payments Void. After the 2018 South Dakota v. Wayfair ruling, cities and states were given more leeway in taxing eCommerce operations that do business in their jurisdictions. Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg went before the U.S.
PYMNTS
AUGUST 30, 2019
in particular, has seen a shifting tax landscape in the past several months, in the wake of the June 2018 Supreme Court decision in the case known as South Dakota vs. Wayfair. To summarize that decision, states can tax sales by companies that do not have a physical presence within the state.
PYMNTS
JUNE 10, 2020
Beyond the challenges of the pandemic that is forcing businesses to grapple with all manner of operating challenges, tax complexity has been building over the years on a global stage — and it’s only going to increase. One significant example can be found in the 2018 Supreme Court ruling known as South Dakota v.
PYMNTS
NOVEMBER 12, 2020
The company, which currently operates 156 grocery stores, noted that the complimentary pickup is available on all Fast Lane orders that are at least $50, while half-off delivery is available on orders of more than $100.
CFPB Monitor
OCTOBER 17, 2022
Ballard’s client also obtained a $440,000 payment from the State of Indiana to resolve its claim for attorneys’ fees as a “prevailing party” in a federal Civil Rights Act lawsuit that it brought following that ruling. The same could be said here. Also, just last week, the U.S.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
474 
Let's personalize your content