CFPB Monitor

AUGUST 25, 2020

The plain language of the governing federal statute applies only to interest that an FDIC-insured state bank may charge. Allegedly, the FDIC’s rule represents an expansion of the FDIA’s preemption of state law interest rate caps by extending the preemption to assignees of loans originated by such banks.

FDIC 78

FDIC District of Columbia North Carolina Illinois 78

CFPB Monitor

APRIL 26, 2021

The Attorney Generals of the six states and District of Columbia who filed a lawsuit against the FDIC to set aside its “ Madden -fix” rule have filed a motion for summary judgment in the case. The lawsuit is pending before the same California federal district court judge (Judge Jeffrey S.

FDIC 78

FDIC District of Columbia California Regulation 78

CFPB Monitor

MAY 26, 2021

The FDIC has filed a motion for summary judgment in the lawsuit filed by the Attorney Generals of six states and District of Columbia to set aside the FDIC’s “ Madden -fix” rule. The filing also includes the FDIC’s opposition to the summary judgment motion filed by the AGs.

FDIC 78

FDIC District of Columbia Regulation California 78

CFPB Monitor

DECEMBER 18, 2020

The Attorneys General of California, Illinois, and New York have filed a motion for summary judgment in their lawsuit filed against the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) to enjoin the OCC’s final rule purporting to override the Second Circuit’s Madden decision as to national banks and federal savings associations.

FDIC 78

FDIC District of Columbia North Carolina New Jersey 78

FICO

DECEMBER 19, 2018

Court Appeals for the District of Columbia vacated key parts of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) 2015 TCPA Order , which had created much confusion and sparked increased litigation. In 2018, California became the first state to adopt GDPR-like privacy legislation. In March, the U.S.

Policies 40

Policies District of Columbia Regulation California 40