PYMNTS

MAY 3, 2016

This is proving particularly true for more and more cash-strapped states that have spent years staring at soaring traffic for online retailers but little — if any — increases in the taxes reaped from this digital, transcontinental economy. And South Dakota, for one, has had enough.

South Dakota 100

South Dakota Taxes Online North Dakota 100

Perficient

JULY 11, 2022

When online shopping, if a retailer has a partnership with a BNPL platform, the customer can choose it as their payment method when placing their order at checkout. Pay in 4 is not currently available for residents of Missouri, New Mexico, North Dakota, South Dakota, Wisconsin, or any US Territories.

Fintech 474

Fintech Trends South Dakota Apple 474

PYMNTS

DECEMBER 30, 2019

Aftershocks from the South Dakota v. Wayfair Supreme Court decision continue to rattle online merchants, as three states (California, Louisiana and South Carolina) are now trying to collect eCommerce sales tax retroactively, as far back as five years. To date 43 states and Washington, D.C. Implementation.

Taxes 130

Taxes Alaska South Dakota South Carolina 130

PYMNTS

JULY 13, 2018

Second-quarter net income was impacted by a $481 million one-time expense resulting from a key Supreme Court decision related to online sales, South Dakota v. The bank has been in recovery mode in recent months, as federal regulators launched a series of investigations into consumer and commercial practices at the lender. .

South Dakota 101

South Dakota San Francisco Indiana Wisconsin 101

PYMNTS

NOVEMBER 29, 2019

By some estimates, total dollars spent online through the holidays should grow by about 14 percent, to as much as $143.7 And in the wake of all those sales lies a pressing issue for merchants plying their trades online: figuring out the tax liabilities. At the same time, navigating tax policies is proving to be a complex business.

Taxes 134

Taxes South Dakota New York Nebraska 134

PYMNTS

OCTOBER 28, 2019

The 2018 South Dakota v. States’ definitions vary, so companies could formerly reduce their exposures by basing their operations in locations with minimal tax rates and avoiding activities in other states that would trigger those jurisdictions’ particular definitions of what counts as a “physical presence.”

South Dakota 105

South Dakota Taxes Retail Arizona 105