CFPB Monitor
AUGUST 25, 2020
The plain language of the governing federal statute applies only to interest that an FDIC-insured state bank may charge. Allegedly, the FDIC’s rule represents an expansion of the FDIA’s preemption of state law interest rate caps by extending the preemption to assignees of loans originated by such banks.
CFPB Monitor
SEPTEMBER 10, 2020
Because CCBank is a state-chartered FDIC-insured bank located in Utah, Section 27(a) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act authorizes CCBank to charge interest on its loans, including loans to California residents, at a rate allowed by Utah law regardless of any California law imposing a lower interest rate limit.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
American Banker
MARCH 11, 2016
Ray Grace, North Carolina's banking commissioner, believes federal bank regulators should embrace charters for banks dedicated to innovation. Doing so, he said, would help the banking industry secure its spot as a "laboratory for change.".
CFPB Monitor
MARCH 15, 2022
The OCC’s attempt to provide a clear bright line test for determining when a bank is the “true lender” in a bank-model program through a regulation was overturned by Congress under the Congressional Review Act.) Maryland, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, and Colorado.
Jeff For Banks
SEPTEMBER 10, 2011
What is interesting about the success of Bank of the Ozarks and its CEO is the fact that he wasn''t the "experienced banker" regulators almost insist upon when approving the appointment of bank leadership. Bank of the Ozarks and their regulators were not so myopic in their view. How did they grow so quickly? billion was 1.24%.
CFPB Monitor
JUNE 15, 2022
Four Democratic members of the California state legislature recently sent a letter to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) urging the agency to take action against FDIC-supervised banks that partner with non-bank lenders to originate high-cost installment loans.
CFPB Monitor
DECEMBER 18, 2020
The OCC failed to consider the rule’s facilitation of rent-a-bank schemes and that the rule creates a regulatory vacuum by placing non-bank loan buyers outside any meaningful regulation. The second lawsuit was filed in the same California federal district court as the lawsuit against the OCC and both cases will be heard by Judge Jeffrey S.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
78 
Let's personalize your content