CFPB Monitor

APRIL 25, 2022

As we will discuss, the timing of the Consent Order indicates that even when regulators permit crypto activities by financial institutions, they remain cautious, particularly as to BSA/AML compliance. The January 2021 Operating Agreement .

Compliance 78

Compliance Digital Banking Training South Dakota 78

PYMNTS

DECEMBER 30, 2019

Aftershocks from the South Dakota v. Wayfair Supreme Court decision continue to rattle online merchants, as three states (California, Louisiana and South Carolina) are now trying to collect eCommerce sales tax retroactively, as far back as five years. To date 43 states and Washington, D.C. Implementation.

Taxes 130

Taxes Alaska South Dakota South Carolina 130

PYMNTS

SEPTEMBER 24, 2019

Seismic change in tax policy came last year in the form of a ruling from the Supreme Court, through the case captioned South Dakota v. You have to understand the nuances between South Dakota, California, and, say, Kansas, which has a ‘zero’ nexus.”. In that case, there are a number of reporting and filing requirements.

Taxes 116

Taxes Retail Online South Dakota 116

PYMNTS

OCTOBER 24, 2019

The 2018 South Dakota v. Now that these laws are being enacted, however, some observers are noting where the policies may need fine-tuning and are pushing for change that would facilitate compliance. Remote sellers are now working to identify the full extent of their eCommerce tax obligations in the areas in which they operate.

Taxes 101

Taxes San Jose Kansas South Dakota 101

PYMNTS

JULY 13, 2018

Second-quarter net income was impacted by a $481 million one-time expense resulting from a key Supreme Court decision related to online sales, South Dakota v. However, we have to do manage our other risks, such as compliance and operational risk.” Revenue fell to $21.6 billion for the quarter, compared with $22.2

South Dakota 101

South Dakota San Francisco Indiana Wisconsin 101

CFPB Monitor

SEPTEMBER 9, 2020

And, Congress has charged the OCC “with assuring the safety and soundness of, and compliance with laws and regulations, fair access to financial services , and fair treatment of customers by, the institutions and other persons subject to its jurisdiction.” Citibank (South Dakota), N.A., 12 U.S.C. § 1 (emphasis added).

FDIC 78

FDIC National South Dakota Lending 78

PYMNTS

JUNE 10, 2020

Beyond the challenges of the pandemic that is forcing businesses to grapple with all manner of operating challenges, tax complexity has been building over the years on a global stage — and it’s only going to increase. One significant example can be found in the 2018 Supreme Court ruling known as South Dakota v.

Taxes 131

Taxes South Dakota Software Compliance 131