The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., which protects customers in the event of certain types of bank failures, is looking into how the bankrupt digital-asset firm Voyager Digital marketed itself to customers, a spokesperson for the agency said.
Voyager, the latest casualty of the turmoil in the crypto markets, has publicly said that any U.S. dollars deposited with the firm are covered by FDIC insurance, thanks to its partnership with Metropolitan Commercial Bank. Wording posted in 2019 on a company web page stated that this protection would take effect in the “rare event your USD funds are compromised due to the company or our banking partner’s failure,” according to the Wayback Machine, which keeps an archive of internet content.
But that wording was since modified and as of Thursday removes the explicit references to company or bank failures, instead saying, “in the rare event your USD funds are compromised, you are guaranteed a full reimbursement (up to $250,000), so the cash you hold with Voyager is protected.” Meanwhile, Metropolitan Commercial Bank issued a statement recently informing Voyager customers that FDIC insurance coverage would only be offered if the bank itself failed and not in event of Voyager’s failure. Voyager declined to comment when asked about the FDIC probe or why it changed the language on its website.
The U.S. government has been increasingly concerned about companies making false advertisements to consumers about deposit insurance. The FDIC in May put out a final rule barring firms from making those kinds of misrepresentations or misusing the FDIC name or logo. Those that violate the rule face enforcement action, including penalties. At the same time, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau issued a warning on the topic, saying the “issue has taken on renewed importance with the emergence of financial technologies — such as crypto-assets, including stablecoins.”
The FDIC spokesperson emphasized in an email Thursday that while Metropolitan Commercial Bank is FDIC-insured, Voyager is not. Therefore deposit insurance does not protect customers against Voyager’s default, bankruptcy, withdrawal freeze, or loss in value of products, the spokesperson said. The CFPB declined to comment. Voyager paused customer deposits and withdrawals last week and then filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy late Tuesday.
Social media has been abuzz with confused and frustrated customers who fear they’ll never get reimbursed for their crypto and cash holdings. Some said they felt misled by the company’s prior statements about FDIC insurance.
Normally such insurance would cover up to $250,000 in losses per depositor — sometimes more if a customer holds several different types of accounts.
The fine print in Voyager’s user agreement was clear about FDIC protection only applying if the partner bank failed but that’s something average retail investors often overlook, said Frances Coppola, a financial blogger who has written about the firm’s issues.
Some of Voyager’s marketing materials were misleading, even if it’s unclear whether the firm did anything legally wrong, she said. “It’s mis-selling.”
Consumer spending slowed and charge-offs rose during the first quarter, but Bread Financial said a pending late-fee rule may not be as devastating to its revenue as the Columbus, Ohio-based firm initially feared.
The FDIC board debated and ultimately withdrew two separate proposals to address asset managers' control over banks, but acting Comptroller of the Currency Michael Hsu said he couldn't support either and called for more research and debate about how asset managers' control over banks impacts safety and soundness.
The state's comptroller of public accounts is one of several notable non-depositories with access to the Fed's payments system, along with the Chicago Mercantile Exchange and the Tennessee Valley Authority. So why do they have accounts while some neobanks don't?
Mortgage rates rose 7 basis points this week, Freddie Mac said, and more increases are likely following a weaker than expected gross domestic product report.
While home lenders are seeing a decrease in issues coming through mobile channels, phone fraud spiked last year, accounting for 28% of losses, a new report found.